zcchc8 cdna constructs (Sino Biological)
Structured Review

Zcchc8 Cdna Constructs, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+zcchc8+cdna/Mouse+ZCCHC8+Gene+ORF+cDNA+clone+expression+plasmid/pmc09433625-384-0-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Chromatin modifier HUSH co-operates with RNA decay factor NEXT to restrict transposable element expression"
Article Title: Chromatin modifier HUSH co-operates with RNA decay factor NEXT to restrict transposable element expression
Journal: Molecular cell
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.03.004
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Schematic representations of the NEXT complex and the minimal PAXT connection. To inactivate these pathways, ZCCHC8 and ZFC3H1 loci were targeted using CRISPR-Cas9. (B) Western blotting (WB) analysis of wild-type (WT) and three independent Zcchc8 −/− and Zfc3h1 −/− clonal cell lines (1–3). Blots were probed with the indicated NEXT- and PAXT-related antibodies and Vinculin (VCL, loading control). Non-specific antibody signals are indicated with an asterisk (*). (C) DE analysis of TE RNAs from Zcchc8 −/− (left) or Zfc3h1 −/− (right) cells versus their WT control. The x axes show the average log 2 FC of RNA-seq data, including multiple mappers ≤ 100, from three KO clones versus three WT samples, and y axes show the log 10 false discovery rate (FDR) values. Vertical lines denote log 2 FC = 0.5 or −0.5, and horizontal lines denote −log 10 FDR = 1. Red dots denote significantly upregulated values (log 2 FC > 0.5, FDR < 0.05), and gray dots denote significantly downregulated values (log 2 FC < −0.5, FDR < 0.05). The number (N) of significantly upregulated TE RNAs are indicated for each KO condition in red font. (D) Bar plots of upregulated TE RNAs stratified by class (x axis). The y axis shows the percentage of significantly upregulated (log 2 FC > 0.5, FDR < 0.05) RNAs relative to their genomic representation in Zcchc8 −/− and Zfc3h1 −/− versus control samples from multi-mapped (≤100) RNA-seq data. Absolute values of upregulated TE RNAs are indicated for each class. (E) As in (D) but stratified into retrotransposon subfamily classes. (F) Genome browser views of four upregulated TE RNA examples (LINE, LTR, SINE) from either unique or multi-mapped (≤100) RNA-seq data as indicated. RNAseq tracks from two replicates of stranded WT, Zcchc8 −/− , and Zfc3h1 −/− samples are displayed with relevant strand direction (+/−) and genomic coordinates (mm10). TE annotations are extracted from the mouse Repeatmasker genomic dataset (mm10). Gene models are based on Gencode (M22). (G) WB analysis showing depletion of 3F-mAID-tagged proteins in OsTIR1-HA-expressing cells following −/+ treatment with IAA (12 h). Samples were derived from untagged, Zcchc8–3F-mAID, Rbm7–3F-mAID , and Zfc3h1–3F-mAID cells. Membranes were probed with antibodies against ZFC3H1, FLAG, ZCCHC8, and Actin (ACTB, loading control). (H) qRT-PCR analysis of indicated NEXT ( proRPL27a ), PAXT ( SNHG10 ) or NEXT/PAXT ( proRNH1 ) targets or TE RNAs ( L1Tf , MuERV-L , B2 SINE ) from total RNA isolated from cells described in (G). Results were normalized to GAPDH mRNA levels and plotted relative to OsTIR1-IAA control samples. Columns represent the average values of technical triplicates (individual data as points) with error bars denoting the SD.
Techniques Used: CRISPR, Western Blot, RNA Sequencing Assay, Clone Assay, Expressing, Derivative Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Isolation
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Schematic representation of the HUSH complex. (B)WB analysis of FLAG IPs from chromatin lysates of WT and MTR4–3F cells. Chromatin input and IP samples were probed with antibodies against FLAG, ZFC3H1, MTR4, MPP8, and H3 (input loading control). (C) As in (B) but using ZCCHC8–3F cells. Membranes were probed with antibodies against FLAG, MPP8, MTR4, and H3 (input loading control). (D) WB analysis of MPP8 IPs from lysates of WT and TASOR-3F cells. IgG IPs were included as a negative control. Lysates from each cell line were split into two, with input samples loaded for each IP. Membranes were probed with antibodies against MPP8, FLAG, ZFC3H1, MTR4, ZCCHC8, and RPLP0 (input loading control). (E) WB analysis of MPP8 IPs from lysates of MPP8–3F-mAID or TASOR-3F-mAID cells either mock or IAA treated (8 h). Input and IP samples were probed with antibodies against MPP8, FLAG, ZCCHC8, MTR4, and RPLP0 (input loading control). (F) WB analysis of MPP8 IPs from lysates of TASOR-3F cells. Lysate extractions and IPs were carried out in increasing NaCl concentrations (0.1–1.0 M) as indicated. Membranes were probed with antibodies against MPP8, ZFC3H1, MTR4, ZCCHC8, FLAG, and Actin (ACTB, input loading control). (G) WB analysis of MPP8 IPs from WT lysates following mock or Benzonase treatment before final elution from beads. IgG IPs serve as a negative control. Lysates were split into two for either MPP8 or IgG IPs, with input samples loaded for each IP. Input and IP samples were probed with antibodies against MPP8, ZCCHC8, MTR4, TASOR, and TUBULIN (input loading control). (H) Metagene (upper) and heatmap (lower) profiles of unique mapped RNA-seq reads from WT, Zcchc8 −/− , and Zfc3h1 −/− datasets within a 10 kb window centered on MPP8 ChIP peaks. Heatmap rows are sorted by MPP8 peak signal intensities. Coverage of uniquely mapped reads are displayed for + and − strands. (I) Genome browser views of five MPP8 target loci. Displayed tracks include input and MPP8 ChIP-seq data from two replicate experiments as well as RNA-seq data from two replicates of WT, Zcchc8 −/− , and Zfc3h1 −/− samples. Strand directions (+/−) are noted along with genomic coordinates. TE hosting genes are indicated in parentheses.
Techniques Used: Negative Control, RNA Sequencing Assay, ChIP-sequencing
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) WB analysis of MPP8 IPs from lysates of WT, Z cchc8 −/− , Rbm7 −/− , Zfc3h1 −/− , and Zcchc8 −/− Zfc3h1 −/− cells. Input and IP samples were probed with antibodies against HUSH-, NEXT-, and PAXT-related proteins as indicated and Vinculin (VCL, input loading control). Non-specific bands are indicated with an asterisk (*). (B) WB analysis of MPP8 IPs from TET :: OsTIR1 - FLAG , MTR4 - 3F - mAID cells following doxycycline (DOX) and/or IAA treatment (4 h) as indicated. Input and IP samples were probed with antibodies against MPP8, MTR4, ZCCHC8 FLAG, and Actin (ACTB, input loading control). (C) Left: WB analysis of MPP8 IPs from WT or Zcchc8 −/− cells stably expressing MYC-tagged ZCCHC8 fragments labeled with amino acid numbers as in the right panel. Input and IP samples were probed with antibodies against MPP8, ZCCHC8, MYC, MTR4, and Vinculin (VCL, input loading control). Right: schematic representation of ZCCHC8 domains, generated fragments, and MPP8 IP data summary. Known protein binding regions are indicated on the top. Fragments shown to be HUSH binding (green) or not (red) are indicated, and a putative binding region is shown.
Techniques Used: Stable Transfection, Expressing, Labeling, Generated, Protein Binding, Binding Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Metagene (upper) and heatmap (lower) profiles of signals from input and MPP8 ChIP-seq samples from WT or Zcchc8 −/− datasets within a 2 kb window centered on MPP8 peaks. MPP8 ChIP samples are from two WT replicates and two Zcchc8 −/− clones. (B) Genome browser views of four MPP8-bound loci. Displayed tracks include input and ChIP-seq data from WT or Zcchc8 −/− cells as well as stranded RNA-seq data from the same cells. Only RNA-seq data from relevant strands are displayed as in . For intronic TEs, the relevant host gene is included in parentheses. (C) H3K9me3 ChIP-qPCR analysis at MPP8-bound loci ( Kcnq1ot1, Srrm2 ) and control regions not bound by MPP8 ( Pmp22 , Utp6 ) in WT or Zcchc8 −/− cells. Data are shown as the percentage of input with error bars indicating the SD of technical triplicates (individual data as points). Statistical significance was assessed using a two-tailed paired Student’s t test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ns, not significant). (D) qPCR analysis of IgG and FLAG ChIPs from MPP8-bound loci ( Cdc37l1 , Ncoa1 , Fgf14 ) and a control region not bound by MPP8 ( Utp6 ) in WT and Zcchc8 - 3F cells. Data are represented as percentage input values of three biological replicates and displayed as in (C). (E) WB analysis of lysates from WT and Mpp8 - mAID Zcchc8 - 3F OsTIR1 - HA cells either mock or IAA treated (12 h). Membranes were probed with antibodies against MPP8, ZCCHC8, FLAG, HA, and Actin (ACTB, loading control). (F) qPCR analysis of IgG and MPP8 ChIPs at MPP8-bound loci ( Kcnq1ot1 , Fgf14 , Cdc371l ) in from Mpp8 - mAID Zcchc8 - 3F OsTIR1 - HA samples described in (E). (G) qPCR analysis as in (F) but for IgG and FLAG ChIPs from the same samples.
Techniques Used: ChIP-sequencing, Clone Assay, RNA Sequencing Assay, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) qRT-PCR analysis of L1 LINE transcripts from total RNA harvested from OsTIR1-HA , Zcchc8–3F-mAID , Mpp8 - 3F - mAID , or Zcchc8 −/− Mpp8 - 3 F- mAID cell lines either mock or IAA treated (72 h). Data representation as in . (B) WB analysis of lysates from three biological WT replicates and three Zcchc8 −/− clonal cell lines. Membranes were probed with antibodies against ZCCHC8, L1ORF1 and Actin (ACTB, loading control). (C) Quantification of L1ORF1 protein levels from the WB in (B). Data show the average value from three replicates, normalized to ACTB levels and plotted as the fold change relative to WT samples. Statistical significance was assessed as in . (D) WB analysis of Mpp8 - 3F - mAID , Zcchc8 −/− , and Zcchc8 −/− Mpp8 - 3F - mAID cell extracts following either mock or IAA treatment (72 h). Membranes were probed with antibodies against ZCCHC8, MPP8, L1ORF1, and RPLP0 (loading control). (E) Metagene profiles of 3′ end-seq signals from pA + and pA +,− 3′ end-seq libraries of WT or Zcchc8 −/− cells and displayed within a 10 kb window centered on MPP8 ChIP-seq peaks. Forward and reverse strands are plotted independently with replicates plotted separately as indicated in the legend. (F) Genome browser tracks of example upregulated L1 LINEs and LTR RNAs from RNA-seq data generated upon MPP8 or ZCCHC8 depletion. Data from Mpp 8- mAID samples, either mock or IAA treated (48 h), are from pA + selected, un-stranded libraries. Data from WT and Zcchc8 −/− cells are from rRNA-depleted, stranded libraries with the relevant strand data represented here. Annotations are displayed as in . (G) qRT-PCR analysis of L1Md_F transcripts from total RNA harvested from samples described in (A). Amplicons were designed to amplify either 5′, center, or 3′ regions of the L1Md_F2 LINE transcript as indicated in the schematics (H) As in (G) but for L1Md_T transcripts.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR, ChIP-sequencing, RNA Sequencing Assay, Generated
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) The HUSH and NEXT complexes function to control expression of TE transcripts at either the transcriptional or post-transcriptional level, respectively. HUSH is recruited to TE loci decorated with H3K9me3 histone marks and is required for maintaining H3K9me3 levels and transcriptional (txn) suppression. NEXT is recruited to HUSH-bound loci through a physical connection that requires ZCCHC8 and MPP8. (B) In the absence of NEXT, HUSH can still bind to chromatin, regulate H3K9me3, and maintain low transcription levels. Without NEXT-mediated RNA decay, short pA − transcripts from TE loci are stabilized. (C) In the absence of HUSH, H3K9me3 levels are not maintained and NEXT is no longer recruited to HUSH-bound loci. TE loci lose transcriptional repression and show an increase in full-length pA + TE RNAs that, in the case of L1 LINEs, can be export competent and subsequently translated.
Techniques Used: Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet:
Techniques Used: Recombinant, SYBR Green Assay, Transfection, Clone Assay, Purification, Software
Related Articles
Expressing:Article Title: ZCCHC8 , the nuclear exosome targeting component, is mutated in familial pulmonary fibrosis and is required for telomerase RNA maturation Article Snippet: hZCCHC8 (NM_017612), h RBM7 (NM_001286045), hSKIV2L2 (NM_015360), hDIS3 (NM_014953.4), and m RBM7 (NM_144948), mSkiv2l2 (NM_028151), hPARN (NM_002582), hEXOSC10/RRP6 (NM_001001998) and were cloned from total cDNA with addition of a tag into a CMV promoter-driven pcDNA5/FRT/TO expression vector using restriction digestion and Gibson cloning (New England Biolabs). hZCCHC8, mZCCHC8, mRBM7, and mSKIV2L2 were all N terminus-tagged (Myc-Flag-Gly-) except that mZCCHC8 included Myc-Gly 4 -Ser- sequence. .. |
